June 4, 2010

SharePoint subcontracts can be raised when it is considered that it is more effective to place discrete packages of work outside of the organisation.

This article is referred to in my book, Managing and Implementing SharePoint 2010 Projects. The article describes, from an academic viewpoint and all in ‘my humble opinion’, a procedure that you could adopt under which you could engage the services of a subcontractor, to aid the delivery of SharePoint 2010 or any associated tasks like branding, customising, solutions and feature building.

There’s a good checklist at the end that you could use when thinking of bringing in a SharePoint subcontract to deliver SharePoint or aspects.

Note. If the following does not display correctly in this site, please try this link:

http://www.geoffevelyn.com/spssite/mmap/subcontractor/index.html

You May Also Like…

SharePoint Copilot Governance and Beekeeping: A Buzz-Worthy Comparison

SharePoint Copilot Governance and Beekeeping: A Buzz-Worthy Comparison

šŸ SharePoint CoPilot Governance and Beekeeping: A Buzz-Worthy Comparison. In the world of digital collaboration, SharePoint is the hive—teeming with activity, rich with resources, and vital to collaboration. But just like a real hive, it doesn’t thrive on chaos. That’s where governance comes in. And oddly enough, the best way to understand SharePoint governance might just be… beekeeping.

Thoughtless SharePoint Site Provisioning: The Hidden Cost of Convenience

Thoughtless SharePoint Site Provisioning: The Hidden Cost of Convenience

In the age of rapid collaboration and cloud-first strategies, provisioning SharePoint sites has never been easier. But with great power comes great potential for chaos. When sites are created without proper analysis, planning, or governance, companies often find themselves buried under a mountain of sprawl, broken workflows, and compliance nightmares.